Blog
- All
- Client intake
- Donor due diligence
- Third party due diligence
- ESG
- Explainable AI
- Litigation support
- Private equity
- Prospect research
- Regulation
Philanthropic due diligence in 2025: Challenges and opportunities
Formalising due diligence is becoming more prominent. While the UK advanced in this area around 2021, only…
Risk-based third party due diligence: A guide for compliance teams
Every organisation depends on a network of third parties to operate. These third parties are the backbone…
How AI is redefining adequate compliance programmes
In today’s interconnected world, businesses heavily rely on third parties to drive operations, expand markets, and stay…
6 best legal software platforms for 2025
Client onboarding, litigation, and M&A matters all benefit from the right technology. However, firms must carefully consider which platforms are worth the investment.
Law firms need better client intake software to improve clearance times
Compliance teams we talk to often feel overwhelmed and under-resourced when it comes to AML compliance. And it’s no surprise—many are still using manual, outdated processes.
Why databases aren’t sufficient for AML risk assessments
While screening is a necessary first step in assessing client risk, it provides only a partial view. These static lists determine whether a client is sanctioned, a PEP, or appears on a watchlist. Screening systems rely heavily on structured databases, which tick a “yes” or “no” box. However, they fail to offer a wider perspective on the client’s overall risk profile.
News and events
Regular updates from the team